Radiocarbon dating vs carbon dating men and online dating

3) Because all life existed at the same time, more organic carbon was present before the flood than after.

4) Since there was more carbon overall, but not more C to carbon-12 was much smaller than it is today.

All of the individuals who participated in the research began with the same view on the age of the earth: it is very young.

This view is spelled out in the summary book of the RATE project by De Young: "Each member of the RATE team holds to a high view of scripture.

According to the science behind radiocarbon dating, very old samples should have no measurable C is thought to exist because of some sort of unexplained phenomenon or contamination.

The technique was pioneered over fifty years ago by the physical chemist Willard Libby, who won the 1960 Nobel Prize for his work on C.

In the traditional model of science, radiocarbon has little to do with the age of the Earth, since its lifespan is so short.

However, RATE is attempting to fit all radiometric dating into a young earth model.

The logic for the theory is as follows: 1) The Bible reveals the age of the earth to be somewhere around 6,000 years.

2) Since the earth is only 6,000 years old, the entire group of life forms represented in the fossil record (save the most recent fossils) existed at the same time and were all buried together in the world-wide biblical flood.

Search for radiocarbon dating vs carbon dating:

radiocarbon dating vs carbon dating-12radiocarbon dating vs carbon dating-57

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “radiocarbon dating vs carbon dating”